Thursday, February 05, 2009
Machel wants to retire?
At Temperature 2, Machel Montano said he's thinking about retiring. He said he can't continue de "chookin" every night for Carnival. I want to know who asked him to start de chooking t'ing in de first place!
Labels:
2009,
January 24,
machel montano,
Montano,
music,
performance,
temperature 2
What's really healthy?
Here are some unhealthy "health" foods and their healthier alternatives:
Not so healthy: Pop-Tarts Whole Grain Brown Sugar Cinnamon (2 pastries)
Healthier: Sun-Maid Raisin English Muffins with Cinnamon
Not so healthy: Healthy Choice Complete Selections Sweet & Sour Chicken (340 g)
Healthier: Kashi Southwest Style Chicken
Not so healthy: Yoplait 99 percent Fat Free Cherry Orchard (1 container, 170 g)
Healthier: Oikos Organic Vanilla Greek Yogurt
Read more on these and the eight other worst healthy foods at http://today.msnbc.msn.com/id/28799225/?pg=4#TDY_11WorstHealthyFoods
Not so healthy: Pop-Tarts Whole Grain Brown Sugar Cinnamon (2 pastries)
Healthier: Sun-Maid Raisin English Muffins with Cinnamon
Not so healthy: Healthy Choice Complete Selections Sweet & Sour Chicken (340 g)
Healthier: Kashi Southwest Style Chicken
Not so healthy: Yoplait 99 percent Fat Free Cherry Orchard (1 container, 170 g)
Healthier: Oikos Organic Vanilla Greek Yogurt
Read more on these and the eight other worst healthy foods at http://today.msnbc.msn.com/id/28799225/?pg=4#TDY_11WorstHealthyFoods
Wednesday, January 14, 2009
No adverse effect?
Our EMA claims that cutting down trees has no adverse environmental effects. Can you believe this? What environmental science degree did the expert at EMA who spouted this bit of ignorance get his degree from, and from what university because clearly they need to be discredited!
Read about the adverse effects of cutting down trees aka deforestation at the National Geographic website:
http://environment.nationalgeographic.com/environment/global-warming/deforestation-overview.html
I suppose it's because they are just some trees at the airport, and not in a forest that they have decided there can be no adverse affect on the environment.
I sincerely hope my sources are mistaken in believing the organisation responsible for safeguarding our environment in T&T could ever be the irresponsible voice condoning the actions of the any agency that chooses to strip our environment of the trees that are such very necessary and aesthetically-pleasing components of our landscape.
Read about the adverse effects of cutting down trees aka deforestation at the National Geographic website:
http://environment.nationalgeographic.com/environment/global-warming/deforestation-overview.html
I suppose it's because they are just some trees at the airport, and not in a forest that they have decided there can be no adverse affect on the environment.
I sincerely hope my sources are mistaken in believing the organisation responsible for safeguarding our environment in T&T could ever be the irresponsible voice condoning the actions of the any agency that chooses to strip our environment of the trees that are such very necessary and aesthetically-pleasing components of our landscape.
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)